Very valid points were made by Groups 6’s blog concerning
the question posed concerning the relationship between first world
career-oriented women and third world migrant women. I can see how there is a
great divide but I also feel that the similarities are not properly
acknowledged.
As we can
tell by the perspectives of Ehrenreich and Hochschild they seem to believe in
this “invisible woman” role being played by the woman who is a migrant worker.
I can understand why at times a migrant worker would appear invisible. The
reason for this is merely because a woman who is strong in her career would
also strive to be just as dominant and excel just as highly in all other
aspects of life. For a woman to admit that she does not have the time she would
like to raise a child on her own is not necessarily something she may be proud
of or want to declare openly, especially amongst other women. Every mom wants
to be “super mom” and succeed in motherhood. Women who have a family as well as
a career are those who strive to have it all. In this day and age it is
necessary for the men and women of a household to work because of the financial
difficulties. These are the necessary steps taken in order to provide their
family a secure and shining future. The enlisted help of a nanny or housekeeper
brought on by migrant workers is what it takes for he show to go on in such
households. With this kind of desperate call for undeniable help there is a
large amount of migrants who find work due to career-oriented women working so
hard themselves.
The
similarities between these two types of women are undeniable to me. Both women
are working hard to support themselves and their families. Women take on the
role of providers both here in America and other first world countries, and
even in Nepal where it because vital due to the push and pull factors. The
similarities between struggling single mothers in our country as well as the
women in places like Nepal who are on their own once their husbands leave to
find work, resemble each other closely. Women are doing what they have to and
taking on more “masculine” roles even if that means not being able to keep up
with the “feminine” roles.
There is a
definite difference in these women when it comes to opportunity and privilege
but the innate qualities in these two classes of women are in fact the same and
often have similar driving forces behind their actions during this time of
globalization and migration.
No comments:
Post a Comment